10 July 2025 – The Seven Sons of St. Felicitas, Martyrs
Contact me: jorgeclavellina2@gmail.com
Translations: Spanish
My name is Jorge Eduardo Clavellina Peñaloza. These are the theological positions on Faith and Morals that I currently hold. My main purpose with this page is to make a public profession of my Catholic Faith.
TOP POSITIONS
Here I will include the most important theological positions I hold, this will also be included in its proper category:
1.- I am Catholic.
2.- I am a sedevacantist.
3.- I hold that Pope Pius XII is the last Pope so far.
4.- I reject the Conciliabulum of Roncalli-Montini, also called Vatican 2.
5.- I reject the Novus Ordo Missae, I consider such rite to be invalid.
6.- I reject the new rite of episcopal consecration, that Montini distributed. I consider such rite to be invalid.
7.- I hold that all Catholics must read Petros. Meaning, all documents coming from a Pope or that can’t be confirmed without his consent, like the Bible and councils.
8.- I hold that Jesus Christ, physically present at all valid masses, Our Lady, and Petros, are three sufficient guides for any catholic soul in 2025.
9.- I accept the position of the Church, regarding evil. That is, that evil has no being, and is just a lack of goodness.
10.- I proclaim only sacramental baptism in water incorporates souls into the Catholic Church, the mystical body of Christ.
11.- I reject the doctrine of baptism of desire for catechumens.
12.- I reject the doctrine of baptism of desire for muslims and other non-catholics.
13.- I condemn the cult of P. Feeney.
14.- I hold that is a fundamental duty for a Catholic in 2025, to profess the Catholic faith in public, with honesty, namely, disclosing the legal name, city of residence and theological positions.
15.- I reject natural family planning.
16.- I reject all forms of contraception.
17.- I believe all Catholics must use parental control software, to censor their internet experience.
18.- I hold that pornographic videos online should be banned in the whole world, by all states.
19.- I am against abortion.
20.- I reject and am opposed to the LGBT movement.
21.- I reject and am opposed to transgenderism.
22.- I reject and am opposed to feminism.
23.- I reject and am opposed to pedofilia.
24.- I consider all states and people who accept abortion, and sexual degeneracy, to be savages.
25.- I reject and am against the genocide in Gaza.
26.- I reject and am against islamist political movements.
27.- I reject and am against nazism.
28.- I reject Darwinism.
29.- I am in favor of fair wages for workers, as defined by Pope Pius XI in his encyclical Divini redemptoris.
30.- It is my firm conclusion that we are not in the end of the end times.
31.- It is my firm conclusion that we are not in the times of the great apostasy.
32.- I hold that we will get a new Catholic Pope, via a miracle, with St. Peter and St. Paul, coming down from heaven to elect him, according to private revelations.
33.- I accept the private revelation regarding the Great Catholic Monarch.
34.- I am a Monarchist.
35.- I am against almost all aspects of secular society in 2025.
36.- I reject the position that says that Una Cum valid masses, cannot be attended by laymen without committing sacrilege.
37.- I reject and am against occultism in all its forms.
38.- I reject and am against Freemasonry.
39.- I am in favor of praying the Holy Rosary in groups.
40.- I desire that the miraculous water of Our Lady of Lourdes be more used by all.
41.- I hold that all Catholics must consecrate their souls to Our Lady.
42.- I reject and am against false apparitions.
43.- I am against doing vows rashly.
FUNDAMENTAL THEOLOGY
Position #1
I am Catholic. I believe in all the dogmas and teachings proclaimed by the Catholic Church, as defined by all the Catholic Councils and in the Magisterium of the Roman Pontiffs.
PT0001
Position #2
I embrace, with the Catholic Church, the notion that evil has no being, but it is rather, a privation of goodness. Specially in how St. Thomas Aquinas explains it in detail in the Summa Theologiae, First Part, Question 48.
PT0002
Position #3
I believe and proclaim that only those who explicitly affirm the Holy Trinity worship or incline toward the One True God. And that Muslims and some Caiphasites, although monotheistic, do not worship the same God as Catholics.
PT0003
Position #4
I believe that Our Lord Jesus Christ is the Sole Redeemer of the human race. And as a result. I don’t believe in the doctrine of Our Lady as Co-Redemptrix, however, it is my position that this topic is firmly within the realm of debatable theological discussion, and therefore, only a Pope can provide clarity and close this debate.
PT0004
Position #5
I reject occultism in all its forms (tarot, New Age, etc.)
PT0005
Position #6
I reject esoteric theology, defined as “intended or likely to be understood only by a small number of people with specialized knowledge or interest,” which, although usually linked to occultism (condemned elsewhere on this page), may be slightly different or adjacent to it.
PT0006
Position #7
I believe and proclaim, along with the saints and the Catholic Church, that Divine Providence is perfect, and that everything that happens, however dark and mysterious it may seem to us, is done for our good and salvation, and that any crisis, cross, punishment, setback or problem, whether individual or collective, is the fruit of the perfectly balanced, just and charitable designs of the Holy Trinity, from God’s permissive will for scandals, to God’s proactive will for virtuous acts throughout the world.
PT0007
EPISTEMOLOGY
Position #8
I believe in the moral necessity for all souls, in 2025, to read Petros. By Petros, I mean the Bible, papal encyclicals, councils, apostolic constitutions, and all other documents that come personally from the Pope or that cannot be confirmed without his consent (such as a council or the Bible), and that this practice guarantees the preservation of the true Catholic faith.
This position, described as “Ite ad Petros,” proclaims that all Catholics should read Petros directly, as a matter of habit, rather than relying on commentaries and summaries from living persons who do not have ordinary jurisdiction.
If the Petros commentary is written by saints and Catholics before 1958, that is not something I oppose. But even so, the guidance a soul should receive should be free of intermediaries to the greatest extent possible.
PT0008
Position #9
I am indebted by the work of countless traditionally inclined people, who, by their prayers, investigations, reflections and books, influenced my life in many ways, and to whom I wish to publicly give credit, even if many were anonymous. In areas like sedevacantism and the invalidity of the novus ordo missae, who was proclaimed by some since the 1960s, moral theology, ecclesiology, etc
I condemn those groups or individuals who falsely represent their conclusions as the product of their sole effort, like what the dimondite sect does in a pathetic and dishonest way.
All that we know is the result of, what is similar to an open source wiki project. Decentralized, collaborative, and the result of decades of work, prayers and effort since the early 1960s. Glory to all these unnamed souls, and also to the ones who are publicly known.
PT0009
Position #10
I favor the scholastic method. Specifically, the “sic et non” method of epistemological discovery. This means, in practice, that I accept objections to the aforementioned positions as long as they are presented professionally. Because objections to the truth help strengthen defenses in favor of truth, as the Summa Theologiae clearly demonstrated several centuries ago.
PT0010
Position #11
I promote the revitalization of Latin as a language of common use. Primarily so that all Catholics can read Petros without having to rely on translations, and also so that any disagreements can be discussed based on the main, official text, and not just any translation.
PT0011
TELEOLOGY
Position #12
It is my opinion that all Catholics should have at least one online space where they publicly profess their Catholic faith, as a fundamental part of their purpose in life. I conclude that this obligation is absolute, and that at least one personal account must publicly profess their true faith, with the following characteristics: full name, photo or image very similar to your likeness, and current city of residence.
PT0012
Position #13
It is my position that, all catholics are absolutely bound to be good. Which means. To do good things. Because only good truly exists, and since evil is a lack of goodness and evil in itself has no being. To refuse or to fail to do good things. Is evil.
I hold the position that this duty is universal, but it must be fulfilled according to the abilities of each Catholic soul.
“By their fruits you shall know them. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit, and the evil tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can an evil tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit, shall be cut down, and shall be cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits you shall know them.” Matthew 7, 16-20
PT0013
Position #14
I support the establishment of traditional Catholic communities where Catholics can worship Christ in the Latin Mass while working and living in close proximity to one another. I believe that online communication for socializing is insufficient, and therefore should be considered a transition to real, tangible communities where true friendships and communities can flourish.
PT0014
ECCLESIOLOGY
Position #15
I am a sedevacantist
PT0015
Position #16
I proclaim that the last Catholic Pope until the year 2025 is Pope Pius XII, (PP. 1939-1958) and all other claimants who followed, from Roncalli to Prevost, are antipopes and usurpers with zero ecclesiastical authority.
PT0016
Position #17
I reject the Second Vatican Council (the Roncalli-Montini Synod) because it taught notoriously heretical doctrines. Specifically, Lumen Gentium no. 16 and Unitatis Redintegratio, although these two examples are not the only ones that present errors or heresies in those documents.
PT0017
Position #18
I am of the opinion, that this era of the sedevacante, requires, by necessity of the circumstances, a more adult type of approach to the spiritual life, (adulta spiritualis). Since we lack a Pope, Bishops and Ordinaries with ordinary jurisdiction. So we need to carry our souls, so to speak, and be more responsible than in other eras, in which we had spiritual sheperds helping us along the way.
I am convicted that this context is useful and necessary for souls, in order to grow in virtue. And that God desire us to be more strong as a result.
“When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child. But, when I became a man, I put away the things of a child.” 1 Corinthians 13:11
PT0018
Position #19
I am of the position, that, in the year 2025, and even though we don’t have a Pope, Bishops and Ordinaries with ordinary jurisdiction, we have 3 Main Sheperds that we can solidly rely on. (Pluri pastores), namely, the following:
1.- Our Lord Jesus Christ, physically present in all the valid masses in the world. Who is willing, able and desiring of entering into our hearts when we do a worthy and proper communion, in which case we can ask him questions, discharge our sorrows, and draw strength. And that, even though this requires an act of faith in the real presence of Our Lord Jesus Christ, is not less real than when Our Lord was preaching in Jerusalem in the year 30 AD.
I believe that this avenue of help, of comfort, of wisdom, and of guidance, can help any Catholic soul in the year 2025, provided these souls do constant acts of faith in the real presence of Jesus Christ, and attend valid mass at least weekly.
2.- Our Lady, to whom Catholics are mystically united, and to whom they can pray confidently in the Rosary and other devotions, and to whom they can rely on, for any necessity and problem.
3.- Petros, who left us thousands of documents, with doctrine fallen from heaven, defining with infallible precision the deposit of Faith, and that is accessible globally and in most languages, so that we can get precise instructions in how to live, what to believe, how to act, and what/who to avoid.
PT0019
Position #20
I am of the position, that the physical relics of saints can also provide effective and real guidance and grace, and that these saints can be a solid friend on earth, to any Catholic in the year 2025 who visits them with pious intentions and doing constant acts of faith and piety, through a mystical, but also very real, and very physical, connection to these blessed souls. – (Pluri pastores).
PT0020
Position #21
I proclaim that only those who explicitly follow the Vatican II conciliabulum without reservation and who explicitly follow from Roncalli to Prevost as well as their application of Vatican II are part of the Inanist Sect. This group, roughly speaking, would be composed of about 100,000 people worldwide. Along with Prevost, these include anti-cardinals, anti-bishops, invalid priests, monks and nuns, and some laypeople who have studied the literature on the subject and who follow the aforementioned people or event without any reservations.
PT0021
Position #22
I proclaim that the status of people who claim to be Catholic, not included in the description of position #20, is variable, and many of them are Catholic, for example, sacramentally and validly baptized pre-adolescents in the 7-10 age range, who have read a catechism without error and know little else beyond that.
PT0022
Position #23
I affirm the dogma that the Catholic Church is pure and that nothing evil comes from her. Rather, it comes from the three enemies of the soul: the flesh, the world, and the devil. I reject any idea that claims the Church herself has sinned or become evil, such as what the Dimondite sect says about the valid popes (Pius XI and Pius XII) as heads of the beast of Revelation. I condemn this as blasphemy, heresy and false prophesy.
Likewise, I reject all those who claim that the Church sinned through historical events, such as the Crusades or the Holy Inquisition, or that the Church sins through scandals wrongly attributed to her, as in the case of some who attribute evils to the Church by attacking anti-bishops for their sins. I reject all such attacks as unjust, blasphemous, and heretical. For the source of these evils is either outside of it through heretics, or in elements that are not Her, such as the world, the devil, and the flesh.
PT0023
Position #24
I reject and condemn the idea that the Catholic Church in the year 2025 is only known to a select few—that is, a select remnant. More bluntly, I reject the idea of an esoteric Church of initiates. I proclaim, instead, that the Catholic Church interacts with everyone in the world, is universally known, and has members worldwide (approximately 450 million as of July 2025).
More precisely, I condemn and reject groups that claim to be Catholic and traditional, such as the Dimondite sect, who claim that the Church is known only to a select few souls, based on the error that we are in the times of the Great Apostasy. I reject this error whether it applies to 2025 or to the future times of the Antichrist, since at that time, even then, the Church will be a globally recognized and anti-esoteric force, as Holy Scripture points out in the following passage:
“And when the Antichrist killed the two witnesses, the whole world held a feast.”
Even at the end, the Church will be universally recognized and visible. Its most essential characteristics will be undiminished and unattenuated, since it has a divine origin and is the unstoppable, indefectible, and infallible institution of the one true God, Jesus Christ, the Second Person of the Holy Trinity.
PT0024
Position #25
I reject the idea that the Catholic Church itself is in crisis at the present time. Rather, I proclaim that the only crisis is that of human beings in their own hearts, who fail to see the Church correctly and, as a result, fall into grave temptations against the faith, ecclesiological errors, and, in the worst cases, heresy, blasphemy, and apostasy.
The Church itself is in a state of tranquility in 2025. Although it is true that it is excommunicating, at an accelerated pace, those who become heretics by their own volition in 2025.
PT0025
Position #26
It is my position that there are three levels of Prevost’s followers in 2025:
1.- Material followers in good faith: These represent the vast majority of people today. They follow Prevost without being aware of his teachings, simply because the historical context of how he arrived there is materially compelling. These could be Catholics if they have not independently adopted errors. For example, if a French farmer without internet access follows Prevost materially, but only has basic knowledge of the catechism, he would be Catholic, even as an adult.
2.- Material followers in error: These are those who follow Prevost materially, but disagree with several of his ideas, yet still follow him materially. Most people who lean toward traditional Catholicism and are not sedevacantists fall into this category. These people, since they also follow him materially due to their understanding of Catholic doctrine and Vatican I, could still be Catholics in some cases, but this depends on their knowledge of theology, their mental capacity (a higher IQ means they are more inexcusable for their errors and vice versa), the errors they know of Prevost and Bergoglio (if they know the most egregious errors, it’s worse, etc.).
In this group, many are Catholics (although they would be very weak, ignorant, and negligent Catholics), others are Catholics but commit mortal sins against the faith, others are highly suspected of heresy, and in some cases, some are notoriously heretical, for example, if they believe in a blasphemous ecclesiology and understand its implications, such as what some believe, that the Church is full of scandal and they are going to “save” the Church.
3.- Formal Followers: These are those who fully understand Prevost’s teachings, fully agree with him without reservation, and that’s it. These are notorious heretics. They basically include liberal anti-bishops and anti-cardinals, etc.
PT0026
Position #27
It is my position than conversion is a fitting term when describing protestants who become Catholics, or atheists who become catholic, or any other adherent to a false religion who becomes Catholic. However, when referring to people who are traditionally inclined, who claim to be Catholic, who still believe and practice several tenets of Catholicism, the term that I propose due to it’s accuracy is: refinement or clarification.
Meaning that someone who is in error in many areas, but is not a formal heretic, will get clarification in order to understand the Catholic Faith, and embrace it. And that this process is different to a conversion to the Catholic Faith, in the strict and canonical sense of the word, and rather, more similar to a successful catechesis.
PT0027
Position #28
It is my position that all Catholic chapels built from the time of the Apostles until 1958 are the property of the Catholic faithful. Therefore, we can pray in these places, as they are part of our heritage and were built for our benefit, since prayer is necessary for salvation.
I reject the position that physically being inside these buildings is a sin, due to members of the Inanist sect usurping these places.
PT0028
Position #29
I believe that all structures built after 1959, classified as Catholic chapels, may be visited, because no Pope or Bishop with ordinary jurisdiction has condemned these places. Since these places claim to be Catholic, many Catholics frequent them, and many images and relics of true saints are found there, it is beneficial to visit them and pray within them whenever necessary. Because prayer is necessary for salvation.
PT0029
Position #30
I reject modernism as described and condemned by Pope St. Pius X in his encyclical Pascendi Dominici Gregis.
PT0030
Position #31
I reject and condemn all religions that are not the true religion. Only Catholicism, as defined in detail by the Council of Trent, is the true religion.
PT0031
Position #32
I oppose theocracy, or the pretense of having clergy administer the state. Instead, I promote the position that Catholic lay rulers should be administering the affairs of the state.
PT0032
Position #33
I agree that the Pope is infallible in the manner defined by the First Vatican Council.
PT0033
Position #34
I proclaim that ecumenical councils are infallible when the Pope accepts their teachings and confirms them by his own authority for the whole Church.
PT0034
Position #35
I proclaim the infallibility of the canonizations of saints made by the Supreme Pontiff. And I proclaim that anyone who denies this position commits a grave error in this regard.
PT0035
Position #36
I proclaim that even in teachings that are not infallibly declared, the councils must be followed and obeyed. And that such action is morally and doctrinally sound. This same point applies to the acts of the ordinary magisterium of the Pope and the Roman Congregations.
PT0036
Position #37
I proclaim that all sacramentally valid clergy (both priests and bishops) currently lack ordinary jurisdiction. Therefore, all ecclesiastical power vests in Petros for practical and general matters in the year 2025.
PT0037
Position #38
I reject and am hostile to all known sects that are inclined towards traditional Catholicism, such as the para-Protestant Dimondite sect, the Palmar de Troya, the cult of Plinio, Richard Ibranyi, the mystical sects that produce antipopes around the world, etc., etc.
PT0038
Position #39
I am tolerant and friendly toward all souls and groups with traditional Catholic leanings, and I deliberately do not publicly combat them (with few exceptions), since they lean toward true theological positions. And, generally, these souls advance towards the truth, which I wish that it continues.
PT0039
Position #40
I’m not a sedeprivationist. I don’t believe that Prevost had a valid election or that he has a material or legal right to the papacy.
PT0040
Position #41
I reject conclavism, or the theological position that declares that some sacramentally valid bishops, who lack ordinary jurisdiction, can elect a valid pope, and I point out that all previous attempts have predictably produced antipopes.
PT0041
Position #42
I reject the notion that Cardinal Siri remained Pope after his probable election to the Papacy in 1958, which means I completely reject the so-called “Siri Thesis.”
PT0042
SACRAMENTAL THEOLOGY
Position #43
I proclaim that the only way to become Catholic is through sacramental baptism in water. And I reject the doctrine of baptism of desire in all its forms.
PT0043
Position #44
I proclaim that the new rite of episcopal consecration, adopted by Antipope Montini, is invalid. And that all persons consecrated under this rite are not validly ordained priests.
PT0044
Position #45
I proclaim that the Novus Ordo Missae (or new order of the mass) is invalid. And all masses said under such rite are invalid masses. Which means, english, spanish or all other such novus ordo rites are invalid.
PT0045
Position #46
It is my position that attending valid Mass on Sundays and holy days of obligation is not ecclesiastically obligatory under penalty of mortal sin, because few valid Masses are available globally, and for other reasons of similar importance.
PT0046
Position #47
It is my position that, although attending a valid Mass in Latin or another appropriate liturgical language (Eastern Catholic Rites) in sunday is not ecclesiastically obligatory under penalty of mortal sin, it is morally obligatory, under the premise that if a person does not adore Christ, truly present on the altar, his soul will not be able to obtain the graces necessary for his eternal salvation.
“Without me, you are not capable of having even a good thought.”
PT0047
Position #48
I am in favor of helping Christ. Physically present at the altar of a valid mass. By contributing economically to a valid mass. This is just and valid, since most of the groups who say valid mass (SSPX, CMRI, etc) are not condemned by any Pope or Bishop with ordinary jurisdiction. So, to help materially is NOT a sin, but rather, a positive act. Since it helps bring glory to Christ by buying wine, candles, flowers and hosts, as well as help covering the expenses of mass centers, like a mortgage, or something similar.
I also, further add, that it is an obligation of justice to help maintain a mass center, since anyone who attends to a valid mass is given an invaluable gift that they can’t possibly pay with anything material, but should still reward within their material possibilities, and just like we pay a lawyer when he applies his skills to help us legally, even if that lawyer is not catholic, the same applies to all valid priests but to an infinite degree, since what a priest gives is invaluable for all eternity.
However, this material help only is allowed when applied to groups who have not been formally condemned by a Pope or a Bishop with ordinary jurisdiction, so it’s not allowed to give money to eastern schismatic valid priests, or “old catholic” valid priests, etc
PT0048
Position #49
I believe all lay Catholics can attend any sacramentally valid Mass in the world, as long as the ecclesiastical entity practicing it has not been formally condemned by a Pope. Therefore, valid Masses of Eastern schismatics are NOT an option. The same is true of many valid Masses of the “Old Catholics,” and also of valid Masses that are notoriously heretical, such as some Black Masses.
However, since the SSPX, the CMRI, and other similar groups have not been formally condemned by any Pope or bishop with ordinary jurisdiction, these are all options for Catholics worldwide. This also applies to valid Masses of Eastern Catholic rites, such as the Byzantine rite, etc.
PT0049
Position #50
I reject the theological position called “home-alonism” (Solus Domi), that is, the idea of staying home and not attending any sacramentally valid Mass. I reject this position regardless of the cause or reason given, and I proclaim that all souls need Christ to cultivate piety and grow in virtue.
PT0050
Position #51
I am in favor of preparing for sacramental confession in such a way that takes advantage of 21st-century technology, especially for general confessions. This involves collecting accurate data about oneself through technological means such as personal emails, tweets, bookmarks, browsing history, etc., to achieve a more accurate record of the number of sins, circumstances, and even tendencies. This would result in a more intentional and fruitful sacramental confession.
PT0051
Position #52
I reject the position that states that valid masses in which validly ordained priests say the una cum portion of the canon of the mass, like those of the SSPX, implicate laymen attending those in the mortal sin of sacrilege. I am of the position that only the priest celebrating the mass sins mortally by mentioning an antipope in the canon of the mass.
PT0052
Position #53
I proclaim that sacramental confessions practiced by independent groups (FSSPX, CMRI, etc.) are valid, due to supplied jurisdiction.
PT0053
Position #54
I am in favor of all valid Masses using the pre-1955 Missal, especially for Holy Week rites.
PT0054
Position #55
I recognize that the rite of the Mass contained in the 1962 Missal, which the SSPX uses, is a rite that effects a valid Mass, provided the priest is validly ordained.
PT0055
Position #56
I am in favor of validly ordained bishops merging the most notable episcopal lineages (Thuc, Lefebvre, etc.) in future priests. This will put an end to the controversy and doubts surrounding supposedly invalid lineages.
PT0056
Position #57
I proclaim that marriages celebrated within independent, traditionally inclined groups (SSPX, CMRI, etc.) are valid. Since the marriage contract is effected between both spouses (man and woman), and there is currently no Ordinary who could present an ecclesiastical defect in the event of his absence. This would have occurred in 1957 (for example), if baptized Catholics openly avoided the participation of the Ordinary.
PT0057
Position #58
I consider all “marriages” that are only done with a civil authority to be invalid, since only religious marriages are valid.
PT0058
Position #59
I believe that many people who recite the Mass in Latin and pose as priests. Often, they are not validly ordained priests. In particular, many members of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter, since they have been consecrated by invalid bishops or have similar serious irregularities.
PT0059
Position #60
I reject all formal occultists who collaborated with sedevacantists decades ago, seeking to “consecrate” them to the episcopal order. I consider these episcopal lineages to be extremely dubious. And even when the issues of invalidity are not as relevant due to the sacrilegious practice of re-consecrations to the episcopate practiced in these contexts, I consider these individuals, sometimes as notoriously sacrilegious, but in all cases, as notoriously immoral and imprudent, and therefore, they should be rejected by all Catholics, according to Ad Evitanda Scandala.
PT0060
MORAL THEOLOGY
Position #61
“Judge not, and you shall not be judged. Condemn not, and you shall not be condemned. Forgive, and you shall be forgiven.” Luke, 6:37
I hold that this biblical passage means that we must not judge anyone who is still alive, unless we are forced to do so, since we lack information on the future of such person, and the internal dispositions of Jesus Christ in relation to any human. Which are both critical pieces of knowledge, needed to do a precise judgment.
In the cases in which a judgment is necessary, it is my position that we must strive to have as much first hand information as possible, in order for our judgment to be as precise as humanly possible.
PT0061
Position #62
I reject the use of natural family planning for married couples. Instead, I promote trusting in Divine Providence and allowing God to fully decide how many children a couple conceives and when.
PT0062
Position #63
I reject the use of all contraceptives to produce it’s evil effect of avoiding offspring. This includes, condoms, the pill, abortifacients, IUD, hormone-based artificial methods, etc
PT0063
Position #64
It is my position that all Catholics in the year 2025 have a moral duty to censor their own internet experience through parental control applications, both for themselves and for their children or minors within their jurisdiction. Using programs like Qustodio (https://www.qustodio.com).
Failure to do so, or refusal to do so (for themselves or those under their care), or believing it unnecessary constitutes a critical error, with inescapable moral responsibility and culpability, the severity of which depends on each case.
PT0064
Position #65
It is my position that impure videos and websites should be banned from the Internet, through laws and any other cybernetic means available to the state.
PT0065
Position #66
I reject abortion absolutely and for any reason.
PT0066
Position #67
I reject sodomy and sexual depravity of all kinds, as taught by the Apostles, the Fathers of the Church, the saints and the Popes.
PT0067
Position #68
I reject and am against transgenderism.
PT0068
Position #69
I reject and am against transhumanism.
PT0069
Position #70
I am against the sinful inclination towards pedophilia by some wretched souls, and consider that it should not be tolerated in any public or private forum.
PT0070
Position #71
I am in favor of raising the age of consent to 18, since the purpose of intimacy between people of the opposite sex is to have and educate children, which should only occur within the bounds of marriage, in which only an adult is realistically capable of fulfilling it’s role as a responsible parent.
PT0071
Position #72
I consider all states who approve abortion, sodomy, euthanasia or similar wicked actions, as part of their public laws, as formally savage, destroyers of civilization, and a disgrace to humanity. I think is a duty to publicly regard these governments as savages, as irrational and as lacking any honor due to their failures in this basic area of their duties.
PT0072
Position #73
I condemn the genocide in Gaza, perpetrated by the Caiphasites and actively supported by the evil US government. I hope and pray that both entities receive just punishment for these atrocious crimes and sins that cry out to heaven for vengeance.
PT0073
Position #74
I believe it is an absolute moral obligation to pray for the priests who administer valid sacraments to any soul who comes seeking their help. And not praying for the priest who forgives you during sacramental confession or who gives you Communion is, at the very least, a venial sin against charity and justice.
PT0074
Position #75
I accept the position of the 1917 Code of Canon Law regarding passive attendance at certain non-Catholic religious events. I also point out how this necessarily follows from Holy Scripture, since in many cases, such as that of the prophet Daniel or Joseph during his stewardship of Pharaoh’s affairs, it is unlikely to imagine these figures as scrupulous puritans, acting fearfully regarding their lives and duties.
PT0075
Position #76
I accept the encyclical Mit Brennender Sorge and, as a result, I condemn National Socialism (Nazism).
PT0076
Position #77
I reject homolatry, that is, the give idolatric worship to any race or group of people.
PT0077
Position #78
I accept and promote ethnophilia, that is, love for one’s own ethnic group within reason. And I consider ethnophilia to be a natural duty and right for all human beings.
PT0078
Position #79
I reject the Puritan interpretation of moral theology applied to employment and the labor market, promoted by the Dimondite sect. That is, the idea that working in a position where the company commits immoral acts implies the need to resign. In contrast to this scrupulous position, I defend the understanding of the separation of moral acts, as described by moral theologians, and argue that, generally speaking, most jobs in most complex, legal companies are morally neutral. Just as taxes imposed by the Roman state in Christ’s time did not implicate the Jews who paid taxes in idolatry, due to the moral distance between their actions and those of the idolatrous state. The same applies, generally speaking, to companies like Walmart, etc.
PT0079
Position #80
It is my position that it is necessary to adopt a flexible moral theology regarding careers, one that can accommodate a large family (seven or more children) living comfortably, even to the point of becoming Prime Minister of a country, or becoming famous and having a higher education in formal schools. Like the prophet Daniel, Joseph in Egypt, and Saint Thomas More.
PT0080
Position #81
I am in favor of a fair wage for workers, as defined by Petros in the encyclical Divini Redemptoris, that is, the ability to buy a house on a single income (so that the wife can raise the children) and for that wage to be sufficient for all the children God sends to this family. And I declare any wage less than this to be unjust.
PT0081
Position #82
I reject capitalism as it exists in the year 2025, especially for its crimes against workers and its immoral accumulation of resources in the hands of the rich and powerful, following in this rejection the teachings of Pope Pius XI’s encyclical Divini Redemptoris.
PT0082
Position #83
I reject usury.
PT0083
Position #84
I recognize that the Caiphasites are of their father, the devil, and that the devil has no truth in himself. Which, in practice, means that all the important claims the Caiphasites make about themselves, about their territorial claims, about history, politics, health, economics, religion, morality, genetics, etc., are deeply imbued with lies of all kinds. And I reject these lies and encourage everyone to do the same.
PT0084
Position #85
I accept the doctrine on capital punishment as taught and defended by the Catholic Church.
PT0085
Position #86
I am against the systematic use of lies for political reasons, for example in the case of government agencies like the CIA.
PT0086
Position #87
I oppose and reject unjust wars, as Saint Thomas Aquinas teaches.
PT0087
Position #88
I reject and am against totalitarianism, or the desire of some to create a state that has absolute power in the territory it controls.
PT0088
Position #89
I reject the use of plastic surgery on completely healthy people. That is, plastic surgery performed for purely aesthetic reasons, except in cases where aesthetic facial or body reconstruction is the result of an accident. In the case of surgeries motivated by vanity, I consider this practice sinful, with the level of liability varying depending on the case.
PT0089
Position #90
I am against artificial means of insemination and pregnancy.
PT0090
Position #91
I am against some forms of stem cell research. Specifically, research that involves the destruction of human embryos for their stem cells, which is murder. However I do accept research using stem cells from adult tissues and umbilical cords, which do not involve the destruction of human beings in embryonic developmental stage.
PT0091
Position #92
I am against disconnecting from medical systems of life support, people labeled as “brain dead”, after an accident or similar events, and I think is a positive moral duty to oppose all instances in which someone wants to disconnect a human being under this pretext. I consider such scenario to be murder.
PT0092
Position #93
I am against euthanasia. And I consider all euthanasia procedures to be homicides, or suicides aided by a murderer, if euthanasia was desired by the person who ended up undergoing such a cruel and savage procedure.
PT0093
Position #94
I am in favor of organ donation, however, only if the following points are respected:
1.- That it only be done when the donor’s death is absolutely certain, which is not sufficiently clear when someone is declared “brain dead.”
2.- That the donor does so freely, without pressure.
3.- That there is respect throughout the process, for both the donor and the recipient.
4.- That no money be introduced as an incentive between the donor and the recipient.
5.- That no mortal sin be committed during the entire process, with anything directly related to it.
6.- That organ donation with a living donor be only for organs that do not significantly compromise their health.
PT0094
Position #95
I am against forcibly imposing experimental vaccines on the population.
PT0095
Position #96
I am against human cloning.
PT0096
Position #97
I reject 24/7 fast-food restaurants, which depend entirely on the rejection of Catholic fasting, as well as their disregard for days of rest, such as Sundays and Holy Days of Obligation. I believe that while it is not a sin to eat at these or other establishments, it is necessary to promote a Catholic culture that integrates necessary elements of rest and fasting.
PT0097
Position #98
I reject Protestant culture, in its proposition that abstractions are superior or sufficient, while ignoring material works or actions. Specifically with regard to friendships. I reject the Protestant-leaning conception of the “modern” friend as someone based entirely on the ether, online, and of a “modern” friendship, completely devoid of material and real-life elements, such as help and collaboration, which are only possible by living in the same area. For this same reason, I consider social media to be entirely insufficient for the social needs of souls. As is also demonstrated by the deteriorating mental health of habitual social media users.
PT0098
Position #99
I reject most of modern psychology, as it is, in essence, neo-Pelagianism. However, I also consider anything from that field worthy of attention that conforms to natural reason or verifiable observations:
“Investigate everything and keep what is good.”
PT0099
Position #100
I reject the consumption of scandalous films, and their publication, under the pretext of “condemning” them.
PT0100
Position #101
I reject and condemn the publication of scandalous videos, such as gore (people dying in 7-Eleven, people being run over, accidents, etc.) in any place, be it online or offline.
PT0101
Position #102
I reject the distribution of movies, music, videos and media that can lead people into scandal and mortal sin. And I publicly hold that they must be censored and restricted, in order to not scandalize souls. For this reason, I condemn most of what Hollywood produces and has produced in it’s history.
PT0102
Position #103
I consider attendance at birthday parties and social events, such as Father’s Day, to be morally neutral, unlike the Dimondite sect, which sees these as acts in which a Catholic will commit a mortal sin just by attending, if the attendees are not part of their sect, which I reject as a scrupulous and erroneous position.
PT0103
Position #104
I consider bodybuilding to be a damnable activity and one that violates several Christian virtues, such as humility (by promoting vanity and pride), temperance, prudence, and chastity. And therefore, it is an activity that should be avoided.
PT0104
Position #105
I am against the practice of extreme sports, in which the possibilities of death are high. I consider these sports to be sinful, with the level of liability depending on the case.
PT0105
Position #106
I reject dogmatic veganism or the claim that eating animal flesh is inherently morally corrupt.
PT0106
Position #107
I am against the distribution of genetically modified foods in society, both for humans, livestock and crops.
PT0107
Position #108
I am in favor of anthropocentric ecologism. That is, the care of the environment (lakes, forests, livestock, etc.) for the benefit of humanity and in subordination to it. This necessarily implies that I reject conventional ecolatric ecologism, according to which the Earth and its environment are considered a superior entity to humans, and that humans must protect nature, even to the point of extinction, which I firmly reject and condemn.
PT0108
Position #109
I reject ambiguity in public speaking, such as ironic jokes that can be interpreted in multiple ways (even leading to scandal).
“Let your yes be yes, and your no be no.”
PT0109
ASCETICAL THEOLOGY
Position #110
I promote the pre-1953 discipline of fasting for Eucharistic reception, penitential practices, and Lent, although I also recognize that the only discipline that obliges under penalty of sin is that of Pope Pius XII.
PT0110
Position #111
I accept and promote the Most Holy Rosary of Our Lady, as given to Saint Dominic Guzmán, as a healthy and fundamental devotion that all Catholics should practice daily.
PT0111
Position #112
I promote the practice of praying the Holy Rosary in groups as a way to multiply the merits of all participants. As Saint Louis Marie Grignion de Montfort taught, one rosary prayed for one soul is worth one rosary, while one rosary prayed for 100 souls is worth 100 rosaries for each of the participants.
PT0112
Position #113
I am in favor of praying the Rosary or other Catholic prayers with people of varying degrees of knowledge or inclination to the Catholic tradition, as long as they have not been formally condemned by a Pope or Bishop with ordinary jurisdiction, and as long as they themselves are not notoriously heretical, such as people who are openly liberal and support abortion, etc.
PT0113
Position #114
I accept what Our Lady of Fatima asked for, namely (and according to early historical sources) to pray 5 mysteries of the Holy Rosary daily, and I reject the distortion made by the Dimondite sect on this matter, by implying that Our Lady asked instead for the daily recitation of the 15 mysteries of the Rosary.
PT0114
Position #115
I reject the recitation of the so-called Luminous Mysteries of the Rosary, which were promoted by Antipope Wojtyla.
PT0115
Position #116
I accept the Fatima Prayer as it is found in the earliest manuscripts of the Fatima apparition, namely:
“O my Jesus, forgive us our sins, deliver us from the fires of hell, lead all souls in purgatory to Heaven, especially those in most need of Thy mercy.”
PT0116
Position #117
I proclaim the moral necessity of practicing pilgrimages to all the world’s historic pilgrimage sites. That is, places where approved and credible apparitions and miracles have occurred, such as Fatima, Lourdes, Our Lady of Guadalupe, etc., and, likewise, to all places where venerable relics of validly canonized saints rest. And I reject any position that restricts or prohibits these sites, for any reason, even if they are currently materially administered by followers of Prevost.
PT0117
Position #118
I am in favor of increasing the use of the miraculous water of Lourdes, France, as a suitable remedy for physical and spiritual ailments.
PT0118
Position #119
I am of the position that all catholics must consecrate themselves to Our Lady, as instructed in the method of St. Louis Grignion de Montfort.
PT0119
Position #120
I am of the position that all catholics must consecrate their house to the Sacred Heart of Jesus Christ.
PT0120
Position #121
I am of the position that all Catholics must wear the miraculous medal, properly blessed by a validly ordained priest.
PT0121
Position #122
I am of the position that all Catholics must wear the Carmelite brown scapular, properly blessed and imposed by a validly ordained priest.
PT0122
Position #123
I am of the position that all catholics must wear the green scapular, properly blessed by a validly ordained priest.
PT0123
Position #124
I am of the position that all catholics must practice Catholic devotions, specially the Rosary, novenas, and aspirations, particularly if an indulgence is attached to it. As shown in the Raccolta, or the official index of indulgenced prayers.
PT0124
Position #125
I am of the position that private or public vows should be made ONLY after careful deliberation, with the full and honest intention to fulfill them, and if possible, it is my position that it is better to avoid to do any vow for any reason, because is preferable to fail to do a good action that is not tied to a vow, than to fail to do a good action in a case in which a vow was made, in which case a grave sin may had been committed.
PT0125
SOTERIOLOGY
Position #126
I accept and proclaim that few Catholics are saved, as taught by Jesus Christ, the Apostles, the Church Fathers, and, more recently, by Saint Leonard of Port Maurice, in his famous sermon entitled “The Fewness of the Saved.”
PT0126
Position #127
I reject the doctrine of baptism of desire as a means of salvation for catechumens and persecuted catechumens, as taught by some saints (Saint Thomas Aquinas, etc.), but I also maintain that in 2025, if people believe the same as these saints, such a soul would be in simple error and could still go to heaven, just as these saints believed the aforementioned doctrine and also went to heaven. And that only a Pope can prohibit this teaching, promoted by some saints, and resolve this matter.
PT0127
Position #128
I reject baptism of desire as a means of salvation applied to Muslims and other people who are not formally Catholic, who died in their false religion and without sacramental baptism. I consider this version of baptism of desire to be heretical and, at the very least, a mortal sin against the virtue of faith.
PT0128
Position #129
I accept and proclaim that all those who belong to and die in false religions go to hell.
PT0129
Position #130
I accept the doctrine of ‘scientia media’ as explained by the Jesuit Order. (Auxilis Controversy)
PT0130
Position #131
I accept the scholastic theological positions regarding grace and predestination (Auxilis Controversy)
PT0131
ESCHATOLOGY
Position #132
It is my position that we are definitely NOT at the end of the end times, which means I reject ideas that suggest the world COULD end in two weeks, a year, or similarly short periods. Since (for starters) the Antichrist has not yet arrived.
PT0132
Position #133
I proclaim that we are NOT in the midst of the great apostasy. Given that hundreds of millions of babies around the world are validly baptized, with the Holy Spirit dwelling in their souls, possessing the supernatural habit of the true Catholic faith. Among other reasons.
PT0133
Position #134
I believe, along with the Church Fathers and other saints, that the Antichrist will come from the Caiphasites (the followers of Caiphas, who unjustly condemned Christ as worthy of death), and that the Caiphasites will openly and publicly follow the Antichrist and mistakenly believe that he is the Messiah.
PT0134
Position #135
I believe, along with many saints, that historical Enoch and Elijah will literally (not metaphorically) battle the antichrist in the last days.
PT0135
MYSTICAL THEOLOGY
Position #136
I believe that the world will eventually (in God’s determined time) have a new Pope, and that this Pope will be one of the greatest saints in history, chosen by Saints Peter and Paul, who will come down from heaven for this task, as noted in some private revelations in which I piously believe.
PT0136
Position #137
I accept private revelations about the Great Catholic Monarch, but only those from reliable sources, dating from before 1958, by saints and devout Catholics. Regarding the identity of the Great Monarch, I maintain the opinion expressed in the private revelations, namely, that he will be of royal descent and of the French nation.
PT0137
Position #138
I reject the attitude of some, in which they say that private revelations should be disregarded or ignored. Specially when it comes to highly credible private revelations, like that of Our Lady of Fatima and/or Our Lady of Guadalupe, and I consider the people that hold these views as rash and insulting to pious ears.
PT0138
Position #139
I accept private revelations that are credible and approved by the Church.
PT0139
Position #140
I accept private revelations from before 1958, that are credible for the contents of its correct doctrine, even if an approbation from the Church is not explicit. As long as no condemnation of the Church has been directed at such.
PT0140
Position #141
I reject the false apparitions that have occurred in recent decades, such as Medjugorje, Garabandal, etc.
PT0141
Position #142
I reject the “charismatic” movement in any of its presentations within groups that call themselves Catholic (that follow Prevost) as well as in Protestant groups.
PT0142
CONTRA MUNDUM
Position #143
I am against the formally anti-Christian sect and tribe of the Caiphasites, (the followers of Caiphas), and against their plans and designs in the Middle East, especially their territorial disputes over the land in which Our Lord Jesus Christ, the King of the Jews, preached and in which He sacrificed Himself to save us.
PT0143
Position #144
I am against and reject communism.
PT0144
Position #145
I am against and reject socialism.
PT0145
Position #146
In regards to Sister Lucy, the seer of Fatima, it is my position, alongside many traditionally inclined people, that she was murdered at some point during the antipapacy of Roncalli or Montini, and a pretender fake “sister Lucy” started to act like she was her, which I condemn in the strongest way.
PT0146
Position #147
I publicly oppose the Anglo-Masonic myth and the centuries-old propaganda campaign of defamation against the Spanish Empire (1492-1810), and I publicly acknowledge that Imperial Spain was a truly pious empire, whose fruits are notable, historically significant, and, overall, positive. Among them are the destruction of the cannibalistic Aztec Empire, the conversion of millions of indigenous people to Catholicism, and the construction of hundreds of universities, hospitals, cities, and cathedrals in Latin America, most of which are still in operation.
PT0147
Position #148
I reject and oppose “American exceptionalism,” or the claim, largely made by Protestants, that the United States is a land chosen by God, special, unique, morally upright, and blessed by God. Specifically, because the American state is formally Masonic and Protestant, and the majority of its population has been and remains stubbornly heretical. And without true faith, no one can please God.
PT0148
Position #149
I publicly and openly reject the false perception of Donald Trump held by many in the United States, which is that Trump is generally good, or that he is oriented toward goodness, or that he generally favors goodness, or that he helps the good, etc.
Instead, I proclaim that Trump is a notorious public heretic and an immoral and perverse figure, and that most (if not all) of his good deeds are primarily performed as a strategy to aid evil men and agendas, particularly those of the Caiphasites and their wars. And that Trump, in this sense, is very similar to Antipopes Wojtyla and Ratzinger.
PT0149
Position #150
I reject and condemn Freemasonry and all Freemasons, public or confirmed, throughout history. I affirm that no era of Freemasonry was innocent or “less evil,” since even in its beginnings it was a non-Catholic organization with heretical intentions and teachings.
PT0150
Position #151
I am against and reject feminism.
PT0151
Position #152
I am against and reject zionism.
PT0152
Position #153
I reject Islamist political movements.
PT0153
Position #154
I reject and I am against Italian Fascism, as applied by Benito Mussolini and his supporters.
PT0154
Position #155
I reject and I am against Fascism broadly speaking, specifically because of his antimonarchical impulses, along with other grave and miscellaneous errors.
PT0155
Position #156
I reject Darwinism as heretical, totally unscientific nonsense that goes against natural reason, logic, divine truth, and eternal wisdom.
PT0156
Position #157
I reject Theistic Evolution, I doctrine that I consider to be suspect of heresy.
PT0157
Position #158
I reject Old Earth Creationism, as incompatible with Holy Scripture.
PT0158
Position #159
I am in favor of Young Earth Creationism.
PT0159
Position #160
I reject and condemn P. Leonard Feeney’s sect, which, among other things, practiced family separation between parents and children and other gravely unjust practices.
PT0160
Position #161
I reject the European Union for being liberal, Masonic, and godless. I hope and pray that the nations of Europe can free themselves from its oppression.
PT0161
Position #162
I condemn the cursed idol of the bad death, more commonly and erroneously called “la ‘santa’ muerte” (the ‘holy’ death)
PT0162
Position #163
I reject the eschatology of the Dimondite sect.
PT0163
Position #164
I reject the ecclesiology of the Dimondite sect.
PT0164
Position #165
I reject the corrupt, rigorous, and puritanical moral theology practiced within the Dimondite sect.
PT0165
Position #166
I reject the soteriology of the Dimondite sect.
PT0166
Position #167
I reject the pastoral practice of the Dimondite sect.
PT0167
Position #168
I am formally and explicitly against the Dimondite sect of Fillmore, New York.
PT0168
If you’d like to see my views on secular issues, click here. – saecularis
Comments?, contact me: jorgeclavellina2@gmail.com
